MasonLaw, PC | NC Elder & Special Needs Law Attorney
  • We Do Elder Law
  • Special Needs Law
  • Resources
    • Hot Topics
    • Blog
      • Reader Favorites
      • General
      • Medicaid
      • Medicare
      • Social Security
      • Tax Issues
      • Wills
    • Newsletter
  • About
    • Bob Mason, Attorney
    • Staff
      • Ann Mason, Practice Manager
      • Jennifer Barbee Swift, Benefits Specialist
      • Tammy Webster, Trust Funding Specialist
    • Testimonials
    • News
  • Contact
  • Client Portal
  • We Do Elder Law
  • Special Needs Law
  • Resources
    • Hot Topics
    • Blog
      • Reader Favorites
      • General
      • Medicaid
      • Medicare
      • Social Security
      • Tax Issues
      • Wills
    • Newsletter
  • About
    • Bob Mason, Attorney
    • Staff
      • Ann Mason, Practice Manager
      • Jennifer Barbee Swift, Benefits Specialist
      • Tammy Webster, Trust Funding Specialist
    • Testimonials
    • News
  • Contact
  • Client Portal

Blog

You are here: Home / Blog

May 3, 2011 by bob mason

Robert (he’s the guy who defended OJ!) Shapiro’s LegalZoom, an active seller of do-it-yourself wills and other estate planning documents, is the target of a class action lawsuit in California charging that the company engages in deceptive business practices and is practicing law without a license. The lawsuit arose after an estate plan using LegalZoom documents fell apart.

Also, LegalZoom has been under orders not to sell any documents in North Carolina since 2008. The Cease and Desist letter advises A Wold in Sheep's ClothingLegalZoom that it is subject to prosecution if it continues to sell legal documents within the state.  On October 3, 2011, LegalZoom filed suit against the North Carolina State Bar.

Online sites selling do-it-yourself wills and other estate planning documents might seem to offer a cost-effective and convenient alternative to visiting an estate planning attorney.

After all, even a simple will, durable power of attorney and health care advance directive prepared by an attorney can cost several hundred dollars per person. Online services promise the same basic estate planning documents for a fraction of that.

But is online estate planning worth the initial cost savings? Are the documents created an adequate replacement for a consultation with a qualified attorney?

Attorneys don’t sell documents, they sell legal advice tailored to individual circumstances. Estate planning attorneys generally have detailed discussions with their clients about their situation, hopes and goals, including their relationships with their children. If a child has problems with debt, or is anticipating a divorce, or has special needs, certain portions of the estate plan must be adjusted. Online programs don’t ask these questions or address these potentially crucial issues.

Online services never offer advice about who would be appropriate to name as trustee or executor. Not good.

Also, most estate planning programs do not address complicated and often inflexible variations in state law. Because there is no national probate code, a computer program or web site cannot hope to replicate the knowledge of a qualified local estate planning attorney who knows the intricacies of state law.

Tax issues also play a part in any decision about whether to incorporate trusts into an estate plan. If planning software addresses trusts at all, it inevitably produces a rudimentary and risky document. Well-off families, or even families without many liquid assets but with substantial real estate holdings, farms or businesses must engage in far more complicated tax planning.

Further, online programs will not offer parents the opportunity to protect their adult children from some of the financial consequences of divorce, bankruptcy and illness. Rather than giving an inheritance to a child outright and risk the child’s later losing it to creditors or in a divorce settlement, parents can create “spendthrift” or “family protection” trusts that hold assets for the child. This shields the inherited assets from most creditors.

Finally. one of the trickiest areas of estate planning involves families of children with special needs. In most cases, especially when the child with special needs receives or anticipates receiving government benefits, leaving money directly to the child can be devastating. An entire category of trusts, known as supplemental needs or special needs trusts, are designed to work within the arcane rules and restrictions of the rules governing disability benefits. None of the online estate planning sites account for these special, and very complicated, rules.

Filed Under: General, Miscellaneous, Wills (or Not!) Tagged With: Online estate planning, Trusts generally, Will forms, wills

May 3, 2011 by bob mason Leave a Comment

 

What does cashing in an IRA, or perhaps converting to a Roth IRA, have to do with Medicare premiums? Maybe a lot . . . a lot of your money.

Occasionally a person going into a nursing home may have to cash in an IRA. In other situations converting a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA may make financial sense. At the right time and with the right advice these may be smart moves. But there can be a hidden cost that many advisors never think of.

Medicare Premiums and Income

First a bit of background on Medicare Part B premiums. Medicare is a federal health insurance program. Part B covers visits to and services by various providers. The insured pay for coverage with premiums, usually by deductions from monthly Social Security checks.

Most Medicare enrollees (72%) have been paying $96.40 monthly Medicare premiums the past few years and may be surprised to learn that the 2011 premiums are actually $115.40 a month. But federal law provides a “hold-harmless” provision that says that for most people the premiums will not go up more than any Social Security cost of living adjustment for the year. As we all know, Social Security has not gone up the past few years, so neither have the Medicare premiums. Had there been a Social Security adjustment for 2011, the monthly premiums could have been as high as $115.40.

The other 27% are not so lucky. For people who do not have premiums deducted from their Social Security checks and for new enrollees the 2011 $115.40 a month applies.

For those pulling in a bit more than average the premiums get even steeper. Individuals with annual income of between $85,000 and $107,000, and married couples with income between $170,000 and $214,000 will pay monthly premiums of $161.50. An individual with income between $107,000 and $160,000 ($214,000 and $320,000 for a couple) will pay $230.70 monthly premiums. There are a number of other brackets that scale upwards until premiums hit $369.10 monthly. You may review the 2011 Medicare premiums, co-pays and deductibles here on this website.

The Social Security Administration looks at income reported two years ago to determine Medicare premiums. In other words, 2009 income is used to determine 2011 premiums.

The Rub: Converting IRAs to Roth IRAs

When someone cashes in an IRA – for whatever reason – the cash-in will probably be a taxable distribution. In other words, if Granddaddy converts a $100,000 IRA to a Roth IRA, he will likely have an extra $100,000 gross income for tax purposes.

The result:  If Granddaddy had other income of $40,000, with his IRA conversion he will have reportable income of $140,000. That means in two years, he will be paying $230.70 in monthly Medicare premiums (using 2011 figures). That amounts to $1,611.60 extra that year.

I am not saying converting to a Roth IRA does not make sense. It may be a great move. Do be aware of the extra costs.

A reader asked me if that was a “hidden tax” and I disagreed with him. There is nothing hidden about it!

Filed Under: Banking, Medicare, Social Security, Tax Issues Tagged With: cashing in an IRA, IRA, Medicare, Medicare premiums

April 4, 2011 by bob mason

Belt tighteningMedicaid is heading for a squeeze. No doubt. One of my jobs is to try to keep up on how that Medicaid squeeze may come about. My guess is it will come in the form of something called a “waiver.” Learn about waivers here and see what may be coming to a state near you.

In case you have been busy mapping tributaries on the Amazon, the US is in the middle of a budget crisis. I do not believe anyone can dispute that something must be done; the dispute will be over what that something will be.

Currently Congress is playing chicken with a looming government shutdown while arguing over $30 to $60 billion for the 2011 budget (a budget year half over, by the way).

It is on the 2012 budget where the REAL fun will start. The federal budget is divided between Mandatory and discretionary spending. Discretionary spending includes numerous programs, notably defense. Mandatory spending includes Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. As can be seen from the charts, “mandatory” spending chews up 55% of the current budget.

Remember, the House of Representatives writes/approves the budget. The preliminary action comes in the House Budget Committee. The chairman of that committee is Wisconsin Representative Paul Ryan.

Ryan was on Fox News Sunday on April 3 to discuss Republican proposals to cut $4 trillion in spending over the next 10 years. One of the targets will be Medicaid, and Ryan mentioned the word “Waiver.”

To understand what a “Waiver” is one must understand a bit about how Medicaid is paid for.

Let’s look.

The Overview

Think of Medicaid in two parts: Acute care (hospitals, doctors, drugs) and long term care (nursing homes and community care).

Medicaid is actually jointly funded by the states and the federal government. The feds pick up a larger share of the tab for states with lower per capita income. On average, the feds pay for 57% of Medicaid costs. The 2011 federal share for Medicaid acute care is $155 billion and for long term care it is $71 billion. The more states spend, the more the feds kick in. According to the Congressional Budget Office (or “CBO”), the outlays will increase dramatically over the next decade as the Boomers continue to age.

When it comes to benefits provided and eligibility standards under Medicaid, the feds set the general rules. The states are somewhat free to improvise, but that ability is limited because the feds set the minimum rules. In other words the states must “color inside the box” the feds have drawn for them.

A state may color outside the lines, however, if the feds “waive” the usual rules. Thus the term “Waiver.”

The CBO Waiver Option

In March, the CBO issued a  report called Reducing the Deficit: Spending and Revenue Options. The report lays out extensive suggestions for budget cutting together with projected revenue savings associated with each cut.

With respect to long term care (nursing home) Medicaid, the CBO offers an alternative that would grant the states effective waivers to devise their own benefit levels and eligibility standards. The CBO suggestions are couched in terms of block grants – essentially give the states money and have them devise and run individual long term care programs.

The block grants would be tied to the fed’s 2010 payment levels and would be indexed according to one of two suggested methodologies. Projected savings would vary from $41 billion to $73 billion through 2016.

Presumably Representative Ryan is thinking along these lines.

Pros and Cons of CBO Waiver or Block Grant

On the plus side, the idea would eliminate the extra federal subsidy for big-spending states and provide greater predictability in federal outlays. Further, once freed to devise their own program standards, states would be free to save by imposing more stringent eligibility rules.

Of course, one of the drawbacks of such an approach is also a disadvantage to some: The states would be free to impose much stricter eligibility requirements. Further, much of the growing burden of caring for aging Boomers would simply be shifted to the states . . . or simply shifted away someplace . . . . perhaps to a galaxy far, far away . . . . Finally, such an approach would create greater disparities between the states on benefits offered and eligibility criteria. Medicaid would cease to be a federal program (which, depending upon one’s point of view, may or may not be bad).

My biggest criticism of the approach is that it fails to address the underlying problem or need. I have suggested an insurance-based solution to long term care costs based upon a strategy similar to the CLASS Act and the current Medicare Supplemental Insurance scheme. Alas, Congress does not consult with me.

Plan Ahead!

My advice: Plan Ahead! This is no time to sit around to see what might happen.



Filed Under: General, Medicaid, Nursing Homes, Social Security Tagged With: block grants, Medicaid, Medicaid block grants, Medicaid budget cuts, Medicaid Waiver, waivers

February 28, 2011 by bob mason Leave a Comment

Medicare Improvement Standard A MythI could retire if I had a dollar (better make it five dollars) for every client who had been told she would not qualify for further Medicare nursing home coverage because she was no longer improving or had “plateaued”.

Nonsense. Time to bust a myth!

Medicare Nursing Home Basics

Medicare pays a limited amount of nursing home care, but the care that is paid can be critical to the patient. In order to qualify, however, the patient must meet specific requirements.

First, the patient must have been hospitalized for at least three days. Second, the patient must be admitted to the nursing home for at least one of the underlying conditions treated in the hospital.

Third, the nursing home resident must receive skilled level of care on a daily basis. “Skilled services” actually cover a broad array of services. A common reason given for cutting off Medicare coverage is that “skilled services” are longer needed when, in fact, the patient indeed requires skilled services as broadly defined under the Medicare regulations.

What is “Skilled”?

Skilled services require technical or professional personnel such as registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, physical, occupational or speech therapists. In order for a service to qualify as “skilled”, it must be so inherently complex that it can only be safely and effectively performed by, or under the supervision of, professional or technical personnel.

Importantly, skilled services can include “observation and assessment of a changing condition” as well as “overall management and evaluation of a care plan”. So, for example, monitoring of fluid and nutrient intake might be necessary to prevent dehydration.

The Level Truth About Plateaus

Often nursing homes may mistakenly require a resident to be improving or showing progress in order to continue skilled services and maintain her Medicare coverage. If a resident “plateaus”, or the nursing facility says the resident no longer has rehabilitation potential, the facility may deny her further coverage. Denying Medicare coverage for this reason is improper.

The Medicare regulations are clear that “restoration potential” is not a valid reason for Medicare coverage denial. Other regulations provide coverage for “maintenance programs based on initial evaluations and periodic assessments”. A number of court cases prohibit the use of “rules of thumb” and require individual assessment of an individual’s needs.

Unfortunately, the “improvement standard” has wriggled its way into the system and is improperly applied at all levels, from nursing homes to the appeals level. One reason may be that there are so few advocates who are aware of the rules and who have the skills to appeal a coverage denial.

There may be some help on the way from the courts. Two recent federal court decisions in the past few months agree with my position. Both courts, relying on the regulations discussed above, held that Medicare can pay for skilled care if it is needed simply to preserve a patient’s current functioning or prevent further decline.

Papciak v. Sebelius

In September the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania found in favor of Wanda Papciak, an 81 year old who had Medicare covered services denied by a nursing home on the basis that she was unlikely to improve.

Ms. Papciak sued the Obama administration claiming that Medicare should have considered whether she required skilled nursing care to maintain her current level of functioning.

The court held that “[t]he restoration potential of a patient is not the deciding factor in determining whether skilled services are needed. Even if full recovery or medical improvement is not possible, a patient may need skilled services to prevent further deterioration or preserve current capabilities.”

Anderson v. Sebelius

Sandra Anderson, a 60-year-old buy percocet online woman who had been receiving home health care covered by Medicare following a second stroke, sued when Medicare cut off her benefits.

In October , the US District Court in Vermont ruled in Anderson’s favor holding that “[a] patient’s chronic or stable condition does not provide a basis for automatically denying coverage for skilled services.”

The Pols Weigh In

Recently a group of House Democrats wrote the administration on the issue. “Beneficiaries are frequently told that Medicare will not cover skilled services if their underlying condition will not improve. . . . For example, as people with multiple sclerosis are often not likely to improve, skilled services such as physical, occupational and speech therapies that are necessary to slow the progression of the disease, or maintain current function, are denied. As a result, these individuals’ conditions deteriorate –frequently leading to more intense, more expensive services, hospital or nursing home care.”

Unfortunately, the administration has so far been unwilling to correct its guidelines. That leaves the courts as the last resort. While the recent court opinions add fuel to the growing clamor to enforce the law as written, as district court decisions they have little more than persuasive relevance outside of western Pennsylvania or Vermont.

Fortunately, the nonprofit Center for Medicare Advocacy recently announced an effort to combat this myth. The first approach is to prod the federal regulators to issue clear guidance. If that does not work, litigation will follow.

Wish them luck! Improper denials often harm those most in need of help. These include not only older patients, but also those with disabilities such as Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, Lou Gehrig’s, spinal cord injuries, diabetes, and others.

Stay tuned.



Filed Under: General, Medicare Tagged With: failure to progress, Medicare, Medicare improvement, Medicare plateau

May 28, 2010 by bob mason Leave a Comment

Let Us Never Forget Those Who Gave Their All

We may not, and should not, approve of war and violence. But until we learn to make a better world, that is the way it is, and this is the lesson of Memorial Day:  Nothing is ever wholly negative, nothing is ever wholly lost. Despite all grief and human wastage, even over dead men’s blood and bones, we manage to progress a little.

— Alex Hailey

Filed Under: Miscellaneous, Veterans

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • …
  • 28
  • Next Page »

Browse Articles Here!

Or Search On A Topic

Recent Posts

  • Medicaid Transfer Penalty: Avoid This Costly Mistake
  • Valid POA MUST Be Honored
  • Corporate Transparency Act Now ON HOLD
Protecting North Carolina families with expert elder law and special needs legal services.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Contact / Schedule
  • Free Booklet and Newsletter Signup
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Elder Law
  • Special Needs
  • Medicaid Planning
  • Medicare Planning
  • Estate Planning

© 2025 MASONLAW, PC · NC ELDER & SPECIAL NEEDS LAW ATTORNEY